THE JUDGEMENT debt commission is
probing the accounts of the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC)
to unravel the mystery sale of the oil drilling ship at $24million as
well as the utilisation of the accrued cash.
However, it appears the Sole Judgement Debt Commissioner, Justice Yaw
Apau, and his team may have more sleepless nights over the issue as
latest information provided indicated that documents relating to the
transaction had been shredded.
Fredrick Boniface Senahie, a senior manager at the State Enterprises
Audit Corporation, the state-owned auditing firm that audited the
accounts of GNPC during sale of the ship in 2001, yesterday told Justice
Apau’s commission that working documents that would have provided key
information on the deal had been shredded.
Sale of Drill Ship
Ghana Government in 2001 sold GNPC’s Drill Ship Discoverer 511 at
$24million to service several debts owed by the stated-owned oil company
following a series of failed agreements entered into in the 1990s.
Out of the money received from the sale of the ship, $19.5million was
said to have been paid to Societe Generale as judgement debt secured
against GNPC in a London Court in 1999.
Surprisingly, all the actors in the deal have told the judgement debt
commission probing the transaction in addition to other judgement debt
payments, that they have no documents covering the deal.
As part of efforts to solve this conundrum, the State Enterprises
Audit Corporation was subpoenaed by the Sole Commissioner to produce
GNPC’s audited accounts and working documents for 2001.
The audited firm, led by Mr. Senahie, provided the 2001 audited
accounts of the state-owned oil company but could not produce the
working documents.
The audited accounts indicated that GNPC’s petroleum production
equipment were sold in 2001 but because working documents were shredded,
Mr. Senahie could not explain whether the drill ship was part of the
equipment sold.
According to him, the State Enterprises Audit Corporation ceased to
audit GNPC accounts in 2005 and that explained why the working documents
were shredded.
Justice Apau’s Fury
Justice Apau, a Court of Appeal Judge sitting as the sole
commissioner, registered his displeasure at poor record keeping in the
country, a bad practice, which he bemoaned was being used to virtually
fleece the country.
“If you don’t keep proper records, you can do anything at all and destroy the trace,” the sole commissioner decried.
Other testimonies
The Managing Director of Societe Generale-Ghana, Gilbert Hie, had
earlier told the judgement debt commission that his outfit had no
records of the drill ship and the subsequent judgement debt payment of
$19.5 million to their parent company Societe Generale in 2001.
Mr. Hie indicated that both their offices in Ghana and France did not
have any record on the $19.5 million reportedly paid to Societe
Generale after the sale of the oil ship.
According to him, Societe Generale-Ghana came into existence in 2003
two years after the transaction and, therefore, had no idea about the
payment made in 2001.
He indicated that Societe Generale did not have an of office in Ghana at
the time Tsatsu Tsikata led GNPC engaged the services of the
French-based financial and transaction advisors in the early 1990s.
Mr. Hie, who was subpoenaed to produce documents on the payment, said
before receiving the subpoena, he had no knowledge of the issue.
“I contacted our legal department here in Ghana to contact head
office in France, unfortunately we cannot trace the documents at the
legal department in Paris,” Mr. Hie told the Sole Commissioner.
Destroyed Documents
According to him, as a policy of Societe Generale, all documents
relating to commercial transactions are destroyed after 10 years of the
transaction.
He said the case at hand was more than 10 years and, therefore, it
was most likely that the documents relating to it could have been
destroyed.
“We keep our archives for 10years and the rule is that we destroy
them after 10years”, Mr. Hie reiterated, giving more work for the
judgement debt commission to do.
Counsel for the judgement debt Commission, Kofi Dometi Sokpor,
contested the claim, insisting that by practice they should have copies
of the documents in their archives.
No comments:
Post a Comment