The outbreak of Ebola in West Africa has put the international
community on alert. Observers have described one of the scenes as a state of war. The crisis could no longer be handled by line ministries and affected governments have been forced into a state of emergency.
The immediate sources of the crisis are medical. But lasting
solutions will have to be sought in the wider economic context in which
health care functions. The roots lie in at least two major weaknesses in
Africa's current development trends: poor infrastructure and limited
investment in public health.
The Ebola strain ravaging West Africa and putting the
international community at risk has not changed since the first outbreak
in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Sudan in 1976. But Africa's
rapid urbanisation has by far outstripped the capacity of public
infrastructure and health services to stem the spread of disease.
Two of the countries that are most severely affected (Liberia
and Sierra Leone) endured long periods of civil war that destroyed or
stalled planned infrastructure and public health development. Guinea has
an equally long history of low investment in infrastructure.
As Professor Richard Olds dean of the School of Medicine at the University of California (Irvine) says, the outbreak has occurred in regions that are “much more densely populated, much more urban in their nature and those populations are much more mobile.”
The development of infrastructure needed to provide improved
quality of life, employment and security has lagged behind demand. In
fact, such infrastructure limitations are partly responsible for the slowing rate of urbanisation in many part of Africa.
The same poor infrastructure that is limiting economic
opportunities is also critical for improved public health. The limited
availability of basic amenities such as clear water and sanitation adds
more pressure on the stressed health services.
Infrastructure and public health are intricately connected. In
fact, a functioning infrastructure (such as transportation, energy,
water and sanitation) is the foundation for improved public health. Most
of Africa's urban poor live in slums where such services are limited.
The Ebola outbreak is therefore not just a medical emergency.
It is a clear sign that Africa's current growth patterns cannot be
sustained and can easily unravel as a result of disease outbreaks. The
promise of cities as centres of creativity, innovation and growth cannot
be realised when nearly 70 percent of the urban population lives in
slums.
Africa's rapid urbanisation is occurring in the age of climate
disruption.
The projected ecological changes arising from global warming
as well as local deforestation are sources of additional concern.
Indeed, the displacement of bats
carrying the Ebola virus through deforestation may have contributed to
spread of the disease. Africa's infrastructure for development will
therefore need to include a strong health research component.
Over the last decade African leaders have put considerable
emphasis on the importance of funding agricultural research. There have
been modest gains and a lot more needs to be done. But the Ebola
outbreak is grim reminder on the urgency to pay urgent attention to the
importance of biomedical research.
The basis for strengthening Africa's health innovation systems
already exists in national and regional institute of higher learning
across Africa. Much of this work focuses on finding cures for local
diseases.
The challenge, however, is that they have hardly received the
political attention that is commensurate with their public importance.
What appeared to be an isolated outbreak has quickly turned
into an economic concern across the continent. Unlike famines which have
tended to remain localised, public health emergencies respect no
borders. Long-term responses will need to build on regional and
continental capabilities.
Africa has learned through addressing famine that moving from
one crisis to another is untenable and is now focusing on long-term
agricultural transformation efforts. Similar thinking will need to be
applied to health research. The Ebola outbreak is not an episode; it is a
wake-up call for strategic political action.
The basis for bringing high-level political attention to the
challenge already exists. The African Union recently adopted a 10-year Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy.
The strategy envisages addressing critical challenges such as health
through infrastructure development, higher technical training, and
entrepreneurship.
One of the first measures that African leaders will need to
undertake is to be better informed about emerging trends that are likely
to undermine the economic gains they have so far made. Leaders in most
of the other parts of the world are supported by networks of scientific
advisers. The main task of such advisers is precisely to examine the
risks posed by events such Ebola outbreaks.
It is notable that despite the complex technical issues that
African presidents have to address, not a single country has a
dedicated office of science and technology advisory. A few have
individuals serving as advisors but they lack the legislative, financial
and administrative capacity to be of any value. Such advisory offices
will complement the support that is provided to presidents by chief
economic advisers.
Establishing such presidential science advisory office will
make it easier for African scientists and engineers to contribute their
expertise to human improvement. This can be done through channels such
as the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC) which has been in existence since 2001.
NASAC includes 19 academies that can support high-level
decision-making but their effectiveness is limited by the absence of
presidential science and technology advisory offices. Science speaks.
But it cannot be heard unless political leaders are listening. They do
so not through experts whispering in their ears but by relying on robust
offices of science and technology advice.
The Ebola outbreak is a crisis of immense proportions. But it
is also an opportunity to facilitate building basic infrastructure,
putting in place public health systems and establishing offices of
science and technology advice. Those who continue to lead without the
help of scientific and technical advice can hardly see far. Doom awaits
them and their followers.
Calestous Juma is Professor of the Practice of International Development and Faculty Chair of the Innovation and Economic Development Program at Harvard Kennedy School. During the 2014-2015 academic he will be Dr Martin Luther King Jr Visiting Professor at the Department of Urban Studies and Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is author of The New Harvest: Agricultural Innovation in Africa.
Follow him on twitter: @calestous and @AfriCrop
|
Source:
Al Jazeera
|
No comments:
Post a Comment